Reviewers

Reviewers

JOURNAL OF EMERGING ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGIES

The Journal of Emerging Engineering Technologies (JEET) is supported by reviewers with expertise in technology, education, engineering, economics, and related fields.

Reviewers play an essential role in maintaining the academic quality and integrity of JEET. They provide independent and constructive evaluations of submitted manuscripts and assist the editorial team in making informed publication decisions.

Double-Blind Peer Review

JEET applies a double-blind peer-review process. The identities of authors and reviewers are kept confidential throughout the review process.

Reviewer Board

Hellik Hermawan, M.Kom.
Affiliation:
Faculty of Computer Science,
Universitas Amikom Purwokerto
Purwokerto, Indonesia
Area of Expertise: Technology
Fandy Neta, S.Pd., M.Pd.T
Affiliation:
Teknik Informatika,
Universitas Ary Ginanjar
Jakarta Selatan, Indonesia
Areas of Expertise: Education, Technology
Scopus ID: 57219782278 Google Scholar
Seliwati, S.Kom., M.Kom
Affiliation:
Teknik Komputer,
Politeknik Piksi Ganesha
Bandung, Indonesia
Area of Expertise: Technology
Rahmat Rambe, S.Kom., M.Kom.
Affiliation:
School of Industrial and System Engineering,
Telkom University
Bandung, Indonesia
Area of Expertise: Technology
Scopus: Not provided Google Scholar
Iswahyudi, S.T., M.T
Affiliation:
Fakultas Teknik,
Universitas Muhammadiyah Jember
Jember, Indonesia
Area of Expertise: Technology
Scopus ID: 57220006529 Google Scholar
Sri Anita, S.Kom., M.T.
Affiliation:
Bisnis dan Teknologi,
Universitas Pertiwi
Bekasi, Indonesia
Areas of Expertise: Education, Technology, Economy
Annisa Hestiningtyas, M.Kom.
Affiliation:
Informatika,
UIN Sultan Aji Muhammad Idris Samarinda
Samarinda, Indonesia
Area of Expertise: Technology
Muhammad Ifan Saputra, M.T
Affiliation:
Engineering / Electrical Engineering,
Universitas Lampung
Bandar Lampung, Indonesia
Areas of Expertise: Technology, Social and Community

Reviewer Responsibilities

Reviewers are expected to evaluate manuscripts objectively, confidentially, and constructively. Their assessments should focus on the originality, relevance, methodology, academic quality, results, discussion, references, and overall contribution of the manuscript.

Reviewers should disclose any potential conflict of interest and should not use unpublished information obtained through the review process for personal or professional advantage.

Confidentiality

All reviewers are expected to maintain the confidentiality of submitted manuscripts and reviewer communications throughout and after the review process.